I was (more than) a bit silent lately. The thing called ‘life’ happens and you get dragged away from your computer ;)
The strange thing is that lately, I’ve been doing more artwork than coding, so the new openSUSE 11.4 is fully stripe-themed and (IMO) looks awesome.
I don’t use openSUSE, but that doesn’t mean I should avoid contributing to one of the best KDE experiences out there, right? :) (Ok, this ended up being a contribution even to Gnome installs which required quite a lot more work, but I don’t really mind)
The additional thing that made my day was the openSUSE review on the Linux Action Show. Chris (one of the hosts) didn’t stick with the original theming, but chose to use the standard blue Stripes with the Slim Glow plasma theme. The only thing better than being the default is being a choice over the default. :)
Well, after reaching the artwork stardom :), I decided it was the time to return to my true calling. The first thing in line were a few Lancelot bugs that needed attention, and that don’t depend on the future libplasma2 development. No new features yet - but stay tuned - there should be some soon.
The main reason I got involved in developing the activities system in the first place was to have different favourite applications, different usage statistics (files opened, browser history etc.) in different activities. It always seemed daft to have Inkscape, Gimp and similar in the appmenu when I’m doing some non-GUI C++ coding.
The thing that will be responsible for that kind of stuff is the kactivitymanagerd. It currently (4.6) only controls which activities exists (along with icons, names, running/stopped states…), and which one is currently selected.
The next big thing is making it track the user’s behaviour and things that are accessed on per-activity bases. At first the data was supposed to be stored in Nepomuk, but Sebastian raised concerns that it might slow down the database too much (needs to be tested) since it would require a vast amount of data to be stored.
The second option was to use Zeitgeist as proposed by Seif (the lead Z devel). Now that we have a usable Qt API for it, the second option became viable as well.
Since I’m not famous for betting all my money on one horse, I decided to refactor the current code to be able to handle different backends, and use the one(s) that is(are) available.
Currently, the following is planned for the backends:
|Top rated files per (app, activity) pair||yes||yes|
|Top rated files per application||yes||yes|
|Top rated files per activity||yes||yes|
|Files accessed on a specific date||no||yes|
- Rating will be automatically calculated based on usage
- Files, locations, web pages, contacts etc.
- If the tests show that Nepomuk doesn’t slow down when saving each event individually, this will be a ‘yes’
Naturally, if you don’t want to use Nepomuk nor Zeitgeist, you’ll not get the rating goodness. But that doesn’t mean you’ll be left out - per-activity recent documents, places etc. are still a possibility.
Ok, this was a bit longer than I expected, sorry for that :)